<span id="5nxvn"><dl id="5nxvn"></dl></span>
<strike id="5nxvn"></strike>
<ruby id="5nxvn"><dl id="5nxvn"></dl></ruby>
<strike id="5nxvn"></strike>
<th id="5nxvn"></th>
<span id="5nxvn"><video id="5nxvn"></video></span>
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科學與工程領域高質量科技期刊分級目錄第一方陣T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中國核心學術期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中國精品科技期刊
  • 中國農業核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中國科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中國生物醫學SinoMed
中國精品科技期刊2020
李婷,宋曙輝,王正榮,等. 北京地區不同品種西瓜果實的品質分析[J]. 食品工業科技,2024,45(9):265?271. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023050224.
引用本文: 李婷,宋曙輝,王正榮,等. 北京地區不同品種西瓜果實的品質分析[J]. 食品工業科技,2024,45(9):265?271. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023050224.
LI Ting, SONG Shuhui, WANG Zhengrong, et al. Quality Analysis of Different Varieties of Watermelon Fruits in Beijing[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(9): 265?271. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023050224.
Citation: LI Ting, SONG Shuhui, WANG Zhengrong, et al. Quality Analysis of Different Varieties of Watermelon Fruits in Beijing[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(9): 265?271. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023050224.

北京地區不同品種西瓜果實的品質分析

Quality Analysis of Different Varieties of Watermelon Fruits in Beijing

  • 摘要: 以北京地區常見的5個西瓜品種:L600、光輝L1000、京美2K、超越夢想、小甜王為研究材料,對可溶性固形物、硬度、有機酸、可溶性糖、甜度、維生素C等品質指標進行了比較,以期為北京市高品質西瓜品種的篩選提供依據。結果表明,不同西瓜品種的品質特性存在一定差異性,小甜王西瓜果實的硬度及維生素C含量顯著高于其他品種(P<0.05),可溶性固形物含量與其他品種無顯著差異。京美2K和超越夢想的蔗糖、果糖、葡萄糖及總糖含量無顯著差異且最高,小甜王的總糖含量最低。小甜王蘋果酸及總酸含量均顯著高于其他品種(P<0.05),超越夢想的蘋果酸含量最低,總酸含量除與小甜王有顯著差異外(P<0.05),與其他品種均無顯著差異。超越夢想的糖酸比最高但與L600無顯著差異,但顯著高于其他品種(P<0.05)。綜上,京美2K和超越夢想糖含量較高,小甜王維生素C含量較高,以上結果為西瓜在北京地區的品種選擇提供了一定的理論依據。

     

    Abstract: Five common watermelon varieties in the Beijing region, namely ‘L600’ ‘Guanghui L1000’ ‘Jingmei 2K’ ‘Chaoyue Mengxiang’ and ‘Xiaotianwang’ were investigated to compare quality indicators such as soluble solids, hardness, organic acids, soluble sugars, sweetness, and vitamin C. The aim was to provide a basis for the selection of high-quality watermelon varieties in Beijing. The results indicated that different watermelon varieties exhibited certain variations in quality characteristics. Specifically, ‘Xiaotianwang’ displayed significantly higher hardness and vitamin C content than other varieties (P<0.05), whereas the soluble solids content was not differ significantly. ‘Jingmei 2K’ and ‘Chaoyue Mengxiang’ exhibited similar and highest levels of sucrose, fructose, glucose, and total sugars content, whereas ‘Xiaotianwang’ had the lowest total sugars content. Furthermore, ‘Xiaotianwang’ had significantly higher malic acid and total acid content compared to other varieties (P<0.05). ‘Chaoyue Mengxiang’ exhibited the lowest malic acid content, and its total acid content displayed significant differences only when compared to ‘Xiaotianwang’ (P<0.05). In contrast, no significant differences were observed when compared to other varieties. ‘Chaoyue Mengxiang’ had the highest sugar-acid ratio, which was not significantly different from L600 but significantly higher than other varieties (P<0.05). In conclusion, ‘Jingmei 2K’ and ‘Chaoyue Mengxiang’ exhibited higher sugar content, whereas ‘Xiaotianwang’ had higher vitamin C content. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the selection of watermelon varieties in the Beijing region.

     

/

返回文章
返回
在线观看国产成人综合视频